<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KDE 4.1: Good enough for ME</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jucato.org/blog/140/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jucato.org/blog/140/</link>
	<description>The Log Module</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joseph  Reagle</title>
		<link>http://jucato.org/blog/140/comment-page-1/#comment-27075</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph  Reagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jucato.org/blog/?p=140#comment-27075</guid>
		<description>How do you use khotkey3 and do you have to edit them in kde 3&#039;s Kmenu editor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you use khotkey3 and do you have to edit them in kde 3&#8217;s Kmenu editor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winky</title>
		<link>http://jucato.org/blog/140/comment-page-1/#comment-27055</link>
		<dc:creator>winky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jucato.org/blog/?p=140#comment-27055</guid>
		<description>@med
as I expected, the feature request has already been added to the bug tracker (and considering the 325 votes I&#039;m not the only one who is waiting for that)

http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614

to get some other bug reports / feature requests  in okular (related to annotations) take a look at this. I haven&#039;t found a solution to change annotations but now I know how to move them around:

http://bugs.kde.org/simple_search.cgi?id=annotations+okular</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@med<br />
as I expected, the feature request has already been added to the bug tracker (and considering the 325 votes I&#8217;m not the only one who is waiting for that)</p>
<p><a href="http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151614</a></p>
<p>to get some other bug reports / feature requests  in okular (related to annotations) take a look at this. I haven&#8217;t found a solution to change annotations but now I know how to move them around:</p>
<p><a href="http://bugs.kde.org/simple_search.cgi?id=annotations+okular" rel="nofollow">http://bugs.kde.org/simple_search.cgi?id=annotations+okular</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: winky</title>
		<link>http://jucato.org/blog/140/comment-page-1/#comment-27053</link>
		<dc:creator>winky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jucato.org/blog/?p=140#comment-27053</guid>
		<description>@med
That I didn&#039;t think of that to open a bug report. But most it&#039;s already been asked as a feature.

@jucato
I hope it&#039;s not that difficult because right now sharing your annotations and changing them are for me the most needed features in okular and this could be a real improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@med<br />
That I didn&#8217;t think of that to open a bug report. But most it&#8217;s already been asked as a feature.</p>
<p>@jucato<br />
I hope it&#8217;s not that difficult because right now sharing your annotations and changing them are for me the most needed features in okular and this could be a real improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KDE 4.1 a la vuelta de la esquina &#171; Gabuntu</title>
		<link>http://jucato.org/blog/140/comment-page-1/#comment-27017</link>
		<dc:creator>KDE 4.1 a la vuelta de la esquina &#171; Gabuntu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 03:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jucato.org/blog/?p=140#comment-27017</guid>
		<description>[...] Jucato [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jucato [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jucato</title>
		<link>http://jucato.org/blog/140/comment-page-1/#comment-27000</link>
		<dc:creator>Jucato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jucato.org/blog/?p=140#comment-27000</guid>
		<description>@nference: Yes, it&#039;s usable for me even with that Kopete bug. But that&#039;s because (and I&#039;ll be brutally honest with this), I don&#039;t like this version of Kopete at all. I only use it because it&#039;s the only multi-protocol KDE IM app I know. But I have been known to scream and use Pidgin in frustration. In short, Kopete&#039;s bugs doesn&#039;t break the deal for KDE 4.1 for me, because I have already passed terrible judgment on it.

@winky: well yes, there&#039;s a problem with sharing your annotations. I haven&#039;t asked pino about support for that part of the pdf format, but I can imagine that it&#039;s not that easy to support or make really portable, considering its proprietary nature.

@Joseph Reagle: Yeah khotkeys isn&#039;t working in RC 1 (or 2), and I&#039;m not sure how long before that gets fixed. I sort of get around that by running KDE 3&#039;s khotkeys instead. :D

As for printing, unfortunately AFAIK there are 2 Qt bugs that are causing that. KPrinter itself actually works (I can print to PDF), but I haven&#039;t tested printing yet (because at the moment, my CUPS setup is broken anyway). But I&#039;m confident that our KDE hackers are working with the Trolls on getting a fix out ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@nference: Yes, it&#8217;s usable for me even with that Kopete bug. But that&#8217;s because (and I&#8217;ll be brutally honest with this), I don&#8217;t like this version of Kopete at all. I only use it because it&#8217;s the only multi-protocol KDE IM app I know. But I have been known to scream and use Pidgin in frustration. In short, Kopete&#8217;s bugs doesn&#8217;t break the deal for KDE 4.1 for me, because I have already passed terrible judgment on it.</p>
<p>@winky: well yes, there&#8217;s a problem with sharing your annotations. I haven&#8217;t asked pino about support for that part of the pdf format, but I can imagine that it&#8217;s not that easy to support or make really portable, considering its proprietary nature.</p>
<p>@Joseph Reagle: Yeah khotkeys isn&#8217;t working in RC 1 (or 2), and I&#8217;m not sure how long before that gets fixed. I sort of get around that by running KDE 3&#8217;s khotkeys instead. <img src='http://jucato.org/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for printing, unfortunately AFAIK there are 2 Qt bugs that are causing that. KPrinter itself actually works (I can print to PDF), but I haven&#8217;t tested printing yet (because at the moment, my CUPS setup is broken anyway). But I&#8217;m confident that our KDE hackers are working with the Trolls on getting a fix out ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph  Reagle</title>
		<link>http://jucato.org/blog/140/comment-page-1/#comment-26976</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph  Reagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jucato.org/blog/?p=140#comment-26976</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised to hear it will be release in a few days, khotkeys doesn&#039;t even work, and I&#039;m not sure about kprinter either. Here&#039;s hoping for the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised to hear it will be release in a few days, khotkeys doesn&#8217;t even work, and I&#8217;m not sure about kprinter either. Here&#8217;s hoping for the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://jucato.org/blog/140/comment-page-1/#comment-26972</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jucato.org/blog/?p=140#comment-26972</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t even know about the search as you type functionality in present windows and have been using 4.1 since the betas.

And yeah, I agree. Actually I was using 4.0.x and eventually upgraded all my machines to that but I think it is with 4.1 (maybe 4.1.x rather than 4.1.0) that KDE 4 becomes the compelling choice over KDE 3 for most users</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t even know about the search as you type functionality in present windows and have been using 4.1 since the betas.</p>
<p>And yeah, I agree. Actually I was using 4.0.x and eventually upgraded all my machines to that but I think it is with 4.1 (maybe 4.1.x rather than 4.1.0) that KDE 4 becomes the compelling choice over KDE 3 for most users</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
